<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some nature, some people, something else..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/10/12/some-nature-some-people-something-else/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/10/12/some-nature-some-people-something-else/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexandru</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/10/12/some-nature-some-people-something-else/#comment-110340</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=1034#comment-110340</guid>
		<description>Very shallow DOF, indeed. I like your natural light photos, especially the 2nd one. It has some &quot;the red hood story&quot; flavor and some baby lens flavor. I hope the Red Hood is picking mushrooms and not doing something else in the woods ;)

For the other scenes, I would use a lot less artificial light, if you really want to use it and match its WB with the scene&#039;s WB. Maybe I don&#039;t understand the idea behind it, your &quot;different approach&quot; but , hey, it&#039;s my fault because I don&#039;t like artificial light at all. I would use a big bouncer instead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very shallow DOF, indeed. I like your natural light photos, especially the 2nd one. It has some &#8220;the red hood story&#8221; flavor and some baby lens flavor. I hope the Red Hood is picking mushrooms and not doing something else in the woods ;)</p>
<p>For the other scenes, I would use a lot less artificial light, if you really want to use it and match its WB with the scene&#8217;s WB. Maybe I don&#8217;t understand the idea behind it, your &#8220;different approach&#8221; but , hey, it&#8217;s my fault because I don&#8217;t like artificial light at all. I would use a big bouncer instead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spalbird</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/10/12/some-nature-some-people-something-else/#comment-109926</link>
		<dc:creator>spalbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=1034#comment-109926</guid>
		<description>First picture does not work for me. Still for me isolating objects by DOF only is a hit or miss, as I can see the result only correctly on a bigger screen. Other important methods how to isolate an object are lighting, perspective and positioning within the frame. If all well done =&gt; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First picture does not work for me. Still for me isolating objects by DOF only is a hit or miss, as I can see the result only correctly on a bigger screen. Other important methods how to isolate an object are lighting, perspective and positioning within the frame. If all well done =&gt; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

