Just came home from a wedding session and wanted to share this very DP1′ish shot! :D I wanted the flash inside to get the “sunny” feeling. hehe. Anyways. BEDTIME.
Top five posts!
Similar Posts!
Recent Comments
- for the moment.. 58
- jacketpotato: Carl so happy for you. Wonderful breath of life into SD1M, DP1M, DP2M (I photo with a DP1)
- Ricky: OH MY… OH MY… WOW
- Dennis: Well done Sigma! Seems the SD1 has also been rebranded and (much) reduced in price. Please just be sensible...
- Toby: WAKE UP CARL! SIGMA HAS YOU! Follow this Link to get new Energy: http://www.dpreview.com/new...
- Dennis: Carl must have been busy last night :-) “Sigma DP series reinvented as DP1M and DP2M with 15MPx3 sensor...
- Joshua: Hi Carl, I’ve just bought SD15 and 30 f/1.4. After using the camera several days, I found that the...
- Steven Paulson: Wow. More bogus science. Everything LM said in that post is completely wrong. Even the most basic of...
- Oba: Hey Carl! My first time on your website. You know what? This particular photo is one of the reasons I got...
- Max Rottersman: You mentioned that the SD15 would have captured some color information in one of the photos above...
- Per Laursen: Used my 120-300 OS (replacing the old version and Nikkor 200f2+TCs) for 3 weeks now. Spectacular...
- Ricky: While King Carl is working so hard, I’m writing: “…still, I can’t believe all the...
- LionelB: The tiny sensor on the very pocketable Ricoh GR D III is wonderfully filmic in black and white and adequate...
- Claus: Sure, there’s processing everywhere. But I think if you have really solid base-assets like a true large...
- LionelB: That makes the H4D31 quite a lot more expensive than the SD1 but of course anyone serious about spending...
- PrebenR: I usually use the white part in the eye to set the white balance. Also in this case this works to get some...
- LionelB: With my SD14 using 5.1 seems no different than using 5.0. The implementation must be pretty settled by now....
- Scott Kennelly: Just thought I’d put in my 2 cents here . . . SPP 5.0.0 works great for me on this old...
Old goodies.
- Wedding shots revisited..
- Jon and Carolina | Wedding session
- Kristofer och Anneth | wedding session
- Daniel & Maria | Wedding with SD14 and DP1
- DP1 at Sunset.. (Updated)
- DP1 Raw pack for download!
- BW DP1 experiment | iso3200 - 6400
- 14mp B&W sample for download.
- Raw Pack "Club"
- Liquid Nitrogen and my Dad
- Jeannette & Magnus. Part 3 - Together
- Forest trip - the others.
- [link] From another time with SD14 - 21 shots!
- Pearl book | in progress.. [edit]
- Norway - 121 images
- Trip images now availible!
- Man and the pearl | Black and white
- SD14 + Jpeg studio experience. Part 1
Nice Carl… That is a spectacular shot. Is all of Sweden beautiful like this? If it is I need to get out more…
A wedding with a DP1?? Insane, man!
Chris, Sweden IS beautiful like this! :P – Btw, Scott! I had SD14 + 70-200, 18-50, 70mm, 30mm, 12-24 and 50mm 1.4 + DP2 and DP1. I’m not crazy! :)
I think I need to find a place to live like that… Everything where I live is marsh territory the most exotic thing we have are the red ants…
That is a ton of lenses. How many cameras you got going?
Chris, I have lots of gear. :) I’m also keen on shaking the dust of my SD9.. one of these days!
You can use any camera to take great pictures!
How many lights do you use to take this picture? I guess…two?
Hi Ryan, the only extra light is the one you see in the background. They’re standing in shallow sunlight but I agree with you, if I didn’t know the setup I would guess the same! Or perhaps a reflector. Thanks for your kind comment. :)
Carl, I appreciate your posts on the 17-70 OS which I have researched and like very much to be my event photography and weddings lens (I am budget restricted) for a DX. I keep seeing that a constant f2.8 is required (eg 17-50, or 18-50). My thinking is that with OS on the 17-70 f2.8-f4 I am no worse off (exposure-wise) for low light wedding than the highly recommended Canon 24-105L f4 (which I read has a low light advantage because of the 4 f-stop advantage over the Canon 24-70L f2.8; I know these are FX, but it’s the principle I am trying to deal with here). For very low light I may get a cheap 50mm f1.8 and (cheap manual focus only) 85mm f1.4. Am I off beat? Have you used the 17-70 in weddings / events where the FX “equivalent” 24-105L is natural recommendation. How is it for weddings in general?