<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Need a Canon lens!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105733</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105733</guid>
		<description>How about to consider the Sigma 50mm/1.4? It has Canon mount version, maybe you could try to find one from Sigma Sweden rep office...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about to consider the Sigma 50mm/1.4? It has Canon mount version, maybe you could try to find one from Sigma Sweden rep office&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105365</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105365</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin, Yes - of course. I want to lend a Canon lens. :) But If I can&#039;t lend one then I need to find one and Robert&#039;s suggestion is a good one. The 50mm 1.8 is cheap and works great. I got some emails from people willing to lend me some equipment for the trip - one 50mm 1.4 and some other lenses. Sad only that most of them lives too fat away. 

The 35mm 1.4 might be king - but 35mm is very wide on a FF camera. I like wide. If someone close to me could lend me I would take it without blinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin, Yes &#8211; of course. I want to lend a Canon lens. :) But If I can&#8217;t lend one then I need to find one and Robert&#8217;s suggestion is a good one. The 50mm 1.8 is cheap and works great. I got some emails from people willing to lend me some equipment for the trip &#8211; one 50mm 1.4 and some other lenses. Sad only that most of them lives too fat away. </p>
<p>The 35mm 1.4 might be king &#8211; but 35mm is very wide on a FF camera. I like wide. If someone close to me could lend me I would take it without blinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105339</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105339</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re asking, because you rather want to borrow the lens too instead of just getting advices which one, aren&#039;t you? =) If I had to take one only lens to china it would be the 35/1.4. But I neither live in sweden nor in china ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re asking, because you rather want to borrow the lens too instead of just getting advices which one, aren&#8217;t you? =) If I had to take one only lens to china it would be the 35/1.4. But I neither live in sweden nor in china &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert e</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105225</link>
		<dc:creator>robert e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105225</guid>
		<description>Hello, I came looking for DP2 images, and saw your post about Canon lenses. I don&#039;t know about Sweden and China (or any stops you are making), but the EF 50/1.8 is very cheap, very good (though soft wide open) and used to be easy to find at least in the USA. Not USM, so focusing noise may be a problem for video. Sigma and Canon both make 50/1.4 USM for full frame. They are four times the price of the 50/1.8, but might be easier to find. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I came looking for DP2 images, and saw your post about Canon lenses. I don&#8217;t know about Sweden and China (or any stops you are making), but the EF 50/1.8 is very cheap, very good (though soft wide open) and used to be easy to find at least in the USA. Not USM, so focusing noise may be a problem for video. Sigma and Canon both make 50/1.4 USM for full frame. They are four times the price of the 50/1.8, but might be easier to find. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris(ThePanda)</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105098</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris(ThePanda)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105098</guid>
		<description>I know just imagine the creamy bokeh on a face going in and out of focus!

You can get a lens adapter to turn the 50 backward and use it as a macro too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know just imagine the creamy bokeh on a face going in and out of focus!</p>
<p>You can get a lens adapter to turn the 50 backward and use it as a macro too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105097</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105097</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a bad idea. I wish it would be something like 1.4 though. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a bad idea. I wish it would be something like 1.4 though. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris(ThePanda)</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2009/06/30/need-a-canon-lens/#comment-105091</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris(ThePanda)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/?p=765#comment-105091</guid>
		<description>How about the new 24-70 2.8 HSM from Sigma

I here is is suppose to be sharp and a zoom would lighten the load.

You could get nice wide shots (always useful in film) with the 24mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the new 24-70 2.8 HSM from Sigma</p>
<p>I here is is suppose to be sharp and a zoom would lighten the load.</p>
<p>You could get nice wide shots (always useful in film) with the 24mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

