As some of you have noticed, some shots, especially at ISO50 has cut highlights in a ugly way – This currently is a bug in the new SPP 3.3(mac) and SPP 3.5(PC) software (processing bug) and rumors says that they’re working on a fix (Foveon / Sigma). I’d recommend older versions of SPP for processing of SD14 / DP1 files as this bug can be quite nasty for some pictures – DP2 files still need the new SPP. You can have dual version on the same computer. Read the Sigma Dpreview forum for updates.

Top five posts!
Similar Posts!
- [link] Interesting take on SD14 resizing.
- Proper sharpening of SD1 images.. (+ dog)
- SD1 sharpness settings etc.. (edit)
- [img] SD14 in the Studio together with 5D..
- [img] Full SD14 image – take a closer look.
- Dynamic range among digital SLR
- Setup
- Sigma DP1x Raw pack I
- DP2 in Camera Raw 5.4 vs Sigma Photo Pro 3.3
- Raw Developer 1.71 released. Letter from Brian Griffith.
Recent Comments
- for the moment.. 64
- Warren: Wow big news, I can’t wait until Carl is able to find time for his site again and give us his thoughts...
- Ricky: However the new price tag will push the 3rd party raw converter software makers as Adobe and Phase One to do...
- LionelB: Looking like a step forward at last. Some caution though — if a lower density of sensors on the chip would...
- Henry: This just in … SD1 at NORMAL prices (2500 USD) , no need to wait for a new product cycle ; ) !!!!!!!!!...
- Andre: BTW, in my opinion, if Sigma would create a SD1-Merill F (with F mount) and SD1-Merill EF (Canon mount) they...
- Joshua: Hi Carl, I’ve just bought SD15 and 30 f/1.4. After using the camera several days, I found that the...
- Steven Paulson: Wow. More bogus science. Everything LM said in that post is completely wrong. Even the most basic of...
- Oba: Hey Carl! My first time on your website. You know what? This particular photo is one of the reasons I got...
- Max Rottersman: You mentioned that the SD15 would have captured some color information in one of the photos above...
- Per Laursen: Used my 120-300 OS (replacing the old version and Nikkor 200f2+TCs) for 3 weeks now. Spectacular...
- Ricky: While King Carl is working so hard, I’m writing: “…still, I can’t believe all the...
- LionelB: The tiny sensor on the very pocketable Ricoh GR D III is wonderfully filmic in black and white and adequate...
- Claus: Sure, there’s processing everywhere. But I think if you have really solid base-assets like a true large...
- LionelB: That makes the H4D31 quite a lot more expensive than the SD1 but of course anyone serious about spending...
- PrebenR: I usually use the white part in the eye to set the white balance. Also in this case this works to get some...
- LionelB: With my SD14 using 5.1 seems no different than using 5.0. The implementation must be pretty settled by now....
- Scott Kennelly: Just thought I’d put in my 2 cents here . . . SPP 5.0.0 works great for me on this old...
Old goodies.
- Wedding shots revisited..
- Jon and Carolina | Wedding session
- Kristofer och Anneth | wedding session
- Daniel & Maria | Wedding with SD14 and DP1
- DP1 at Sunset.. (Updated)
- DP1 Raw pack for download!
- BW DP1 experiment | iso3200 - 6400
- 14mp B&W sample for download.
- Raw Pack "Club"
- Liquid Nitrogen and my Dad
- Jeannette & Magnus. Part 3 - Together
- Forest trip - the others.
- [link] From another time with SD14 - 21 shots!
- Pearl book | in progress.. [edit]
- Norway - 121 images
- Trip images now availible!
- Man and the pearl | Black and white
- SD14 + Jpeg studio experience. Part 1
Is ISO 50 a true iso 50? Or is it like other camera’s that are really just shooting an overexposed iso 100 pulled back to a proper exposure? If so, wouldn’t this explain the hard gradient of blown highlights? I know even my 5D does the same thing when shooting at iso 50. I think you’re better off just shooting iso 100 and exposing to the right in the histogram.
Have there been examples of the bug occurring at faster speeds than ISO50? I have not seen any. ISO50′s tendency to overexpose areas may just make it more prone to this issue though.
In any case, when Sigma fixes their software, be sure to repost this beautiful photo. I love the colors.
Bjorn, I think what I am trying to say is that the there is no amplification to signal difference between ISO 50 and ISO 100. ISO 50 is just the camera shooting at ISO 100 with a +1 exposure compensation that is then pulled back one stop before spitting out a jpg or raw file with these ‘in camera’ adjustments unknown to the user. Obviously with this process highlights are surely to get clipped in scenes with wide dynamic range – as seen in the clothespin image where the shadows of the clothespin would be much darker than the reflective surfaces of the white painted windows of the barn. Carl’s other ISO 50 shots with mostly even lighting show no clipping of highlights. If he shot at ISO 100 and overexposed, he could surely pull back the image in the RAW editor to achieve the same results. If ISO 50 is an optional ISO expansion setting and not a standard ISO, then I believe that no software fix will improve this I’m sorry to say.
Lucas was correct. The ISO 50 of Sigma DP1, like all digital cameras up to this point, is not an actual ISO 50. The DP1′s actual lowest sensitivity of the sensor is ISO 100 equivalent.
I was about to say the same. At least from what I’ve understood so far this is the case. But if light in a scene allows it, you can even push an ISO50 file down to ISO25 in some cases. That’s really really cool. :P (For the DP2) – it mostly depends on what colors and what type of highlighted areas there is. Will try to make examples of this.
Take a look at the linked DP2 image – the lower neon text “An der Hauptwache” shows blown highlights in a pretty ugly way and some pink/purple colors. However, it was shot in ISO200. Any idea what could have caused this result?
http://www.bildercache.de/bild/20090515-163342-490.jpg
Cheers,
Echodyne
My samples of blown highlights (DP1, ISO50).
SPP 2.5
http://foto.ixbt.com/photo/322573/20263Bhw8nTmh7l/335771w.jpg
SPP 3.5.1
http://foto.ixbt.com/photo/322573/85522wvqaCEN1Y/335004w.jpg
Echodyne, I can’t load your image.
Igor, yes. That’s the bug thing. Hopefully they’ll fix it soon.
Pingback: DP1x highlight issue.. Fixable! | Carl Rytterfalk Fotografi