<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upsize DP1 video, Said and GRD&#8217;s.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83108</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83108</guid>
		<description>Just noticed that 3/2=1.5 so you already have your 3:2 option. Isn&#039;t SIGMA great? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that 3/2=1.5 so you already have your 3:2 option. Isn&#8217;t SIGMA great? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83107</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83107</guid>
		<description>I agree although movies in 16:9 format look a lot better at only 320x240 every single pixel counts :-)

I don&#039;t want to be picky but 16/9=1.7 and 320/212=1.5 so there must be another reason for this strange format. Also Sigma speaks of QVGA 320x240 in it&#039;s technical specifications. Anyway that&#039;s not so important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree although movies in 16:9 format look a lot better at only 320&#215;240 every single pixel counts :-)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be picky but 16/9=1.7 and 320/212=1.5 so there must be another reason for this strange format. Also Sigma speaks of QVGA 320&#215;240 in it&#8217;s technical specifications. Anyway that&#8217;s not so important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83100</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83100</guid>
		<description>Martin, you&#039;re correct. It&#039;s called VPS and it&#039;s used for MED and LOW resolutions too. I&#039;m pretty sure they use this when making videos. The true resolution is 320x212 if I remember correctly and I guess that&#039;s something to do with &quot;16:9&quot; view which in my mind isn&#039;t very helpful. Would prefer to have the whole view or 3:2 as option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, you&#8217;re correct. It&#8217;s called VPS and it&#8217;s used for MED and LOW resolutions too. I&#8217;m pretty sure they use this when making videos. The true resolution is 320&#215;212 if I remember correctly and I guess that&#8217;s something to do with &#8220;16:9&#8243; view which in my mind isn&#8217;t very helpful. Would prefer to have the whole view or 3:2 as option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83097</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83097</guid>
		<description>I know that Foveon images can be upscaled a lot better but it&#039;s still unbelievable how good the upscaled 640x480 video sometimes look. It has a cinematic, clear and warm feel to it. Please, please SIgma give us a bigger movie mode! It was one of the first things I&#039;ve noticed in Foveons datasheet many years ago, the sensor pixels can be grouped together to deliver lower rez video. If I remember correctly it&#039;s called VPS or so. Since then I&#039;m waiting for a great Photo/Movie camerawith Foveon sensor. Sigh.

One question though why is there always a black border at the bottom. Actually the video height from the DP1 is smaller than 240 pixels isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Foveon images can be upscaled a lot better but it&#8217;s still unbelievable how good the upscaled 640&#215;480 video sometimes look. It has a cinematic, clear and warm feel to it. Please, please SIgma give us a bigger movie mode! It was one of the first things I&#8217;ve noticed in Foveons datasheet many years ago, the sensor pixels can be grouped together to deliver lower rez video. If I remember correctly it&#8217;s called VPS or so. Since then I&#8217;m waiting for a great Photo/Movie camerawith Foveon sensor. Sigh.</p>
<p>One question though why is there always a black border at the bottom. Actually the video height from the DP1 is smaller than 240 pixels isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83093</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83093</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bad that none of these &quot;super resolution&quot; softwares are made for Mac. Or is there? I&#039;m using final cut pro today and letting it do the upsizing but I know it can be done better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad that none of these &#8220;super resolution&#8221; softwares are made for Mac. Or is there? I&#8217;m using final cut pro today and letting it do the upsizing but I know it can be done better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83090</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-83090</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re just upscaling to 640x480, YUVsoft has a free super resolution application that&#039;s perfect for the DP1&#039;s video files:

http://www.yuvsoft.com/download/super-resolution/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re just upscaling to 640&#215;480, YUVsoft has a free super resolution application that&#8217;s perfect for the DP1&#8242;s video files:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yuvsoft.com/download/super-resolution/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.yuvsoft.com/download/super-resolution/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spalbird</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-81353</link>
		<dc:creator>spalbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-81353</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the upscaled video samples. They are good, but we know the Foveon chip could be even better, starting from a native image with more pixels :)

I enjoyed looking the the DP1 samples from Said, and his opinion about the DP1 is of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the upscaled video samples. They are good, but we know the Foveon chip could be even better, starting from a native image with more pixels :)</p>
<p>I enjoyed looking the the DP1 samples from Said, and his opinion about the DP1 is of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter Brandsma</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-81351</link>
		<dc:creator>Wouter Brandsma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-81351</guid>
		<description>Both you and Said Karlsson are doing an excellent job. The DP1 is a very compelling camera and could be a perfect upgrade for my Ricoh GX100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both you and Said Karlsson are doing an excellent job. The DP1 is a very compelling camera and could be a perfect upgrade for my Ricoh GX100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Said</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-81338</link>
		<dc:creator>Said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2008/03/16/upsize-dp1-video-said-and-grds/#comment-81338</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the nice comment and link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the nice comment and link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

