<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dogs of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: komar_kzy</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-76086</link>
		<dc:creator>komar_kzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-76086</guid>
		<description>Nice photos as allways, a bit grainy though. Pitty that the details are gone. Puppy on the first photo is so sweeeet :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice photos as allways, a bit grainy though. Pitty that the details are gone. Puppy on the first photo is so sweeeet :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-76000</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-76000</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hehe, it was ISO200 but extremely under exposed (with about 3 stop  ) because flash didn't flash. :D - I think Exif is still there. Happened on both pictures. So it's ISO1600  and made black and white in Raw Developer 1.72 with the new monochrome input profile.&lt;/p&gt;

Oh, and the color version might look good. Didn't think about trying. I love black and white and often start there without even trying in color. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, it was ISO200 but extremely under exposed (with about 3 stop  ) because flash didn&#8217;t flash. :D - I think Exif is still there. Happened on both pictures. So it&#8217;s ISO1600  and made black and white in Raw Developer 1.72 with the new monochrome input profile.</p>
<p>Oh, and the color version might look good. Didn&#8217;t think about trying. I love black and white and often start there without even trying in color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shevge</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-75992</link>
		<dc:creator>shevge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-75992</guid>
		<description>which iso?
too bad in color?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which iso?<br />
too bad in color?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive in Basel</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-75987</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive in Basel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/12/24/dogs-of-the-day/#comment-75987</guid>
		<description>That is a very sweet picture, of your Mom and her new friend.  

He looks pretty happy about this friendship too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very sweet picture, of your Mom and her new friend.  </p>
<p>He looks pretty happy about this friendship too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
