<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Test: Sigma 10-20 vs Sigma 12-24 (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-85121</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-85121</guid>
		<description>Hi Richi - Been talking to some using it FF and they're often more satisfied then people running cropped. So you probably did the right thing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richi - Been talking to some using it FF and they&#8217;re often more satisfied then people running cropped. So you probably did the right thing. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richi</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-85059</link>
		<dc:creator>Richi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-85059</guid>
		<description>After reading loads of negative reviews about the 12-24, you have swayed my decision to go for it. I am thinking of upgrading to FF in the next year or two and future proof lenses are a must for me.
I think I'll have to take the chance. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading loads of negative reviews about the 12-24, you have swayed my decision to go for it. I am thinking of upgrading to FF in the next year or two and future proof lenses are a must for me.<br />
I think I&#8217;ll have to take the chance. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ٍEhsan Maraghechi</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-83750</link>
		<dc:creator>ٍEhsan Maraghechi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-83750</guid>
		<description>Tnx a lot dear Carl for this great comparison,it's very hard to decide  between 10-20 and 12-24,i have Nikon D80,what 's your idea a bout my choice? and how you upgraded your 12-24 to DG.
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tnx a lot dear Carl for this great comparison,it&#8217;s very hard to decide  between 10-20 and 12-24,i have Nikon D80,what &#8217;s your idea a bout my choice? and how you upgraded your 12-24 to DG.<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pfau</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-73605</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pfau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-73605</guid>
		<description>Thanks Carl! M Pfau</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Carl! M Pfau</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-71304</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-71304</guid>
		<description>Michael! You have some great stuff! I've seen some of them before (not sure when or why) but I think I commented back on dpreview. I like the mood you show and the treatment you give your pictures! Great stuff. Only thing I think about sometimes is leveling, you are sometimes a couple degree off. A bit more could make it work or totally leveled. Not very easy if you don't see the horizon clearly. 

But again. Great stuff. I will put your site as "friend" site. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael! You have some great stuff! I&#8217;ve seen some of them before (not sure when or why) but I think I commented back on dpreview. I like the mood you show and the treatment you give your pictures! Great stuff. Only thing I think about sometimes is leveling, you are sometimes a couple degree off. A bit more could make it work or totally leveled. Not very easy if you don&#8217;t see the horizon clearly. </p>
<p>But again. Great stuff. I will put your site as &#8220;friend&#8221; site. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pfau</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-71265</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pfau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-71265</guid>
		<description>Dear Carl please check out my work with the SD14 and 10-20 mm. lens at:   www.pbase.com/mdavidp    Thanks, M Pfau, mdavidpfau@msn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Carl please check out my work with the SD14 and 10-20 mm. lens at:   <a href="http://www.pbase.com/mdavidp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbase.com/mdavidp</a>    Thanks, M Pfau, <a href="mailto:mdavidpfau@msn.com">mdavidpfau@msn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65755</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65755</guid>
		<description>Michael Pfau: :D Great! I hope you enjoy it as I do. If you need info or help, just keep me posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Pfau: :D Great! I hope you enjoy it as I do. If you need info or help, just keep me posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65754</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65754</guid>
		<description>Gian Paolo: Yes, the 15-30 is very sharp. You might need to use a software like Lightroom in order to get rid of the yellow cast that the 15-30 has. 

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gian Paolo: Yes, the 15-30 is very sharp. You might need to use a software like Lightroom in order to get rid of the yellow cast that the 15-30 has. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian Paolo</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65751</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian Paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65751</guid>
		<description>Dear Carl thanks for your contribution, here on dpreview forum...
I sold my 12-24 non DG for the 15-30: less wide but sharper from center to corner and a bit faster. I love this old lense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Carl thanks for your contribution, here on dpreview forum&#8230;<br />
I sold my 12-24 non DG for the 15-30: less wide but sharper from center to corner and a bit faster. I love this old lense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pfau</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65722</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pfau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65722</guid>
		<description>I bought an Sd14 and a few lenses thanks to your enlightened and enthusiastic introduction to Sigma.Thanks. M Pfau mdavidpfau@msn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought an Sd14 and a few lenses thanks to your enlightened and enthusiastic introduction to Sigma.Thanks. M Pfau <a href="mailto:mdavidpfau@msn.com">mdavidpfau@msn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65492</link>
		<dc:creator>rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65492</guid>
		<description>hi, just wanted to congratulate for the great sharp, colorful and joyful pictures that you take. i´m realy impressed not just with the camera, but also with the beautiful landscapes. congratulations! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, just wanted to congratulate for the great sharp, colorful and joyful pictures that you take. i´m realy impressed not just with the camera, but also with the beautiful landscapes. congratulations! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adri</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65440</link>
		<dc:creator>adri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65440</guid>
		<description>I have the 15-30, which is very sharp, but not wide enough (around 25.5mm equivalent). The 10-20mm, which I have used (a friend of mine has one) hasn't totally impressed me: some people get sharp images, like Laurence, but others get fuzzy images (operator error?), and I agree, a single focal length lens, around 12mm (ca. 21mm equiv.), which is 2.8 and affordable, would be my dream come true. 

Thanks for the test: I will take a closer look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 15-30, which is very sharp, but not wide enough (around 25.5mm equivalent). The 10-20mm, which I have used (a friend of mine has one) hasn&#8217;t totally impressed me: some people get sharp images, like Laurence, but others get fuzzy images (operator error?), and I agree, a single focal length lens, around 12mm (ca. 21mm equiv.), which is 2.8 and affordable, would be my dream come true. </p>
<p>Thanks for the test: I will take a closer look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65428</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65428</guid>
		<description>Spalbird! Amen. Agree. I want F1.4 - I wonder how big it had to be. I would suggest sigma to make another prime wide angle such as the 14mm 2.8 but something better this time (that one wasn't bad) a prime like 10mm 1.4 DC :D -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spalbird! Amen. Agree. I want F1.4 - I wonder how big it had to be. I would suggest sigma to make another prime wide angle such as the 14mm 2.8 but something better this time (that one wasn&#8217;t bad) a prime like 10mm 1.4 DC :D -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spalbird</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65393</link>
		<dc:creator>spalbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65393</guid>
		<description>Both lenses are too slow :( The 12-24 is definitively worth the money on a 1.3 crop or FF sensor. Owning the 10-20mm all I can say WA rocks! The contrast is very good but concerning resolution I am not sure. Colors are cool. The 10-20 with the color of the 12-24 and a constant aperture of f2.8 would be the photographer's heaven :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both lenses are too slow :( The 12-24 is definitively worth the money on a 1.3 crop or FF sensor. Owning the 10-20mm all I can say WA rocks! The contrast is very good but concerning resolution I am not sure. Colors are cool. The 10-20 with the color of the 12-24 and a constant aperture of f2.8 would be the photographer&#8217;s heaven :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65380</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65380</guid>
		<description>I will have to shoot a brick wall (or something) in order to know exactly how much distortion there is, after that I might consider if needed. Right now I'm a bit lazy using Lightroom, there isn't a tool yet built in. :( it's a bit cumbersome, same goes for Sigmas 30mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will have to shoot a brick wall (or something) in order to know exactly how much distortion there is, after that I might consider if needed. Right now I&#8217;m a bit lazy using Lightroom, there isn&#8217;t a tool yet built in. :( it&#8217;s a bit cumbersome, same goes for Sigmas 30mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65379</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65379</guid>
		<description>Thieu, :) there might be something in there, hmm (didn't see that before grrr). Agree about color. The 12-24 is really good. But also double the price. Question is if it's worth it?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thieu, :) there might be something in there, hmm (didn&#8217;t see that before grrr). Agree about color. The 12-24 is really good. But also double the price. Question is if it&#8217;s worth it?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65358</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65358</guid>
		<description>Does anyone bother correcting lens distortion shown by the 10 20 at wide angle? Not talking about this scene but just in general (for architecture shots etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone bother correcting lens distortion shown by the 10 20 at wide angle? Not talking about this scene but just in general (for architecture shots etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thieu</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65352</link>
		<dc:creator>thieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65352</guid>
		<description>Seems like you have a little dust on your sensor (upper left corner) (sorry for my english i'm french ... :p )

12-24 gives better color and seems to be crisppy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like you have a little dust on your sensor (upper left corner) (sorry for my english i&#8217;m french &#8230; :p )</p>
<p>12-24 gives better color and seems to be crisppy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Greiff</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65320</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Greiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65320</guid>
		<description>I have to agree the 12-24mm is better... But the 10-20mm goes wider...  Oh, decisions, decisions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree the 12-24mm is better&#8230; But the 10-20mm goes wider&#8230;  Oh, decisions, decisions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artis</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65301</link>
		<dc:creator>artis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/07/25/test-sigma-10-20-vs-sigma-12-24/#comment-65301</guid>
		<description>from the samples provided, 12-24 wins - better, colour, contrast.. IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the samples provided, 12-24 wins - better, colour, contrast.. IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
