<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [img] Village photo session</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert de Voogd</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-69174</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert de Voogd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-69174</guid>
		<description>Hi again folks,

A 50mm gives you the 85mm needed to get portraits with less or no
distortion, and still possible to work in not so big studio.

A 85mm gives 145mm what is great for your eye-closeups from Lynn!

I have them both on the F1.8 (85mm) Nikon and F1.7 (50mm) on the Sony
A100 body's.

Tip: Nice to use in the evening at home when there's only some light
putten to get a cosy atmosphere, they autofocus always on F 1.8 and
effectively blur disturbing livingroom-backgrounds.

The F 1.4's or F1.2 i would not advice because of very small DOF !
Cost a lot more too, instead go to ASA 400 or 640-800, for all prints
suitable BTW. (yes, also A3 !)

Let's not forget that an A3 you hang on the wall and you watch it 
from a distance of 3-4 meters.(as ment to be!!!)

Anekdote: in the year 2002 when i worked as a prof. for magazines,
i did all fotoshooting with 2 and 3.3Mp compact camera's, all A4
size printed glamourreportages!

I only resizeded to approx. 200 DPI and that's all.

Tip2all: stop to look at images on your screens, print a few A3's,
frame them and hang them in your house, ohh's and aahh's guaranteed!

Ok ok, last tips then otherwise it might become boring :

Stop shoot in RAW,try JPG and get your shots good rightaway, saves a
lot of time to spend with friends or family !

Forget zoomlenses, take a 50mm and use your feet instead.

Done by millions of photographers for 30 years and look please at
there results !

Take black tape and cover your screen on the back of your camera.

After a few weeks every amateur become a pro !!!!!

After 1 month bring your card rightaway to a printshop, don't look
at the images in the computer first.

Think what you see and only then press the shutter.

Put some trust in these hints, just give it a try and enjoy.

Have a nice day !

Greetings,

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again folks,</p>
<p>A 50mm gives you the 85mm needed to get portraits with less or no<br />
distortion, and still possible to work in not so big studio.</p>
<p>A 85mm gives 145mm what is great for your eye-closeups from Lynn!</p>
<p>I have them both on the F1.8 (85mm) Nikon and F1.7 (50mm) on the Sony<br />
A100 body&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Tip: Nice to use in the evening at home when there&#8217;s only some light<br />
putten to get a cosy atmosphere, they autofocus always on F 1.8 and<br />
effectively blur disturbing livingroom-backgrounds.</p>
<p>The F 1.4&#8217;s or F1.2 i would not advice because of very small DOF !<br />
Cost a lot more too, instead go to ASA 400 or 640-800, for all prints<br />
suitable BTW. (yes, also A3 !)</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that an A3 you hang on the wall and you watch it<br />
from a distance of 3-4 meters.(as ment to be!!!)</p>
<p>Anekdote: in the year 2002 when i worked as a prof. for magazines,<br />
i did all fotoshooting with 2 and 3.3Mp compact camera&#8217;s, all A4<br />
size printed glamourreportages!</p>
<p>I only resizeded to approx. 200 DPI and that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>Tip2all: stop to look at images on your screens, print a few A3&#8217;s,<br />
frame them and hang them in your house, ohh&#8217;s and aahh&#8217;s guaranteed!</p>
<p>Ok ok, last tips then otherwise it might become boring :</p>
<p>Stop shoot in RAW,try JPG and get your shots good rightaway, saves a<br />
lot of time to spend with friends or family !</p>
<p>Forget zoomlenses, take a 50mm and use your feet instead.</p>
<p>Done by millions of photographers for 30 years and look please at<br />
there results !</p>
<p>Take black tape and cover your screen on the back of your camera.</p>
<p>After a few weeks every amateur become a pro !!!!!</p>
<p>After 1 month bring your card rightaway to a printshop, don&#8217;t look<br />
at the images in the computer first.</p>
<p>Think what you see and only then press the shutter.</p>
<p>Put some trust in these hints, just give it a try and enjoy.</p>
<p>Have a nice day !</p>
<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-68931</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-68931</guid>
		<description>You're right. What I could have done is correcting the roundness in photoshop. I like being close to my subjects / models and that is sort of gone if I'm standing far away. 85mm would be a 50mm lens or are you thinking in terms of 85mm x 1.7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. What I could have done is correcting the roundness in photoshop. I like being close to my subjects / models and that is sort of gone if I&#8217;m standing far away. 85mm would be a 50mm lens or are you thinking in terms of 85mm x 1.7?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert de Voogd</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-68863</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert de Voogd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-68863</guid>
		<description>Hi2you,

Nice images and indeed lively, a fresh way of portraiting IMHO.

One remark i like to make about the lens you use many times as your
favorite, the 28mm.
It change many times the shape of the face to much, a balloon effect. 

You will get really more pleasing results by using 50 or 85mm.

Maybe it's not 4 nothing that the 85mm is called a portraitlens ?

Hope 2 see more of your work (maybe using my suggestion?)

Greetings 2 all, Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi2you,</p>
<p>Nice images and indeed lively, a fresh way of portraiting IMHO.</p>
<p>One remark i like to make about the lens you use many times as your<br />
favorite, the 28mm.<br />
It change many times the shape of the face to much, a balloon effect. </p>
<p>You will get really more pleasing results by using 50 or 85mm.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not 4 nothing that the 85mm is called a portraitlens ?</p>
<p>Hope 2 see more of your work (maybe using my suggestion?)</p>
<p>Greetings 2 all, Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Österberg</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-61214</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Österberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-61214</guid>
		<description>Fantastiska bilder Carl. Måste säga att SD14 verkligen ser minst lika bra ut i bilden som min Mamiya. Kanske är det dina kunspaer i Photoshop som ligger bakom, men det ser onekligen bra ut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastiska bilder Carl. Måste säga att SD14 verkligen ser minst lika bra ut i bilden som min Mamiya. Kanske är det dina kunspaer i Photoshop som ligger bakom, men det ser onekligen bra ut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobNL</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-60079</link>
		<dc:creator>BobNL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-60079</guid>
		<description>Some incredible good ideas in there... And fun is really 'splashing' of those faces. Wish you had more time to really develop those ideas, as well in shooting as in postprocessing. Especially those silhouette shots I liked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some incredible good ideas in there&#8230; And fun is really &#8217;splashing&#8217; of those faces. Wish you had more time to really develop those ideas, as well in shooting as in postprocessing. Especially those silhouette shots I liked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-59532</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-59532</guid>
		<description>Yes, we (I) had! Didn't we?! Would be fun if any of the guys and gals on these pictures cared to comment. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we (I) had! Didn&#8217;t we?! Would be fun if any of the guys and gals on these pictures cared to comment. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spalbird</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-59442</link>
		<dc:creator>spalbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/18/img-bralanda-photo-session/#comment-59442</guid>
		<description>Really crazy pictures. It seems not only you had fun :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really crazy pictures. It seems not only you had fun :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
