<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [img] Finally Sven &#038; Jeanettes wedding pictures.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59533</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59533</guid>
		<description>aahh.. maybe I should switch to another one?! Do you think it's that bad? Or I can also do as I did in your case. Delete that duplicate. Not sure if this is a common problem. :)

If you have any ideas of making this "spam" filter better. You tell me Clive! :D And thanks for comment. It's nice to have you onboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aahh.. maybe I should switch to another one?! Do you think it&#8217;s that bad? Or I can also do as I did in your case. Delete that duplicate. Not sure if this is a common problem. :)</p>
<p>If you have any ideas of making this &#8220;spam&#8221; filter better. You tell me Clive! :D And thanks for comment. It&#8217;s nice to have you onboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59381</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59381</guid>
		<description>Carl, 'code' is what we have to enter to make our comment succeed.  

The so-called CAPTCHA  thingie.

If you mis-enter then you are asked to try again - but your comment shows blank then. 

Then we are confused.  Enter the new 'code' now showing?  Will we lose our comment which has now gone blank?  Etc..

If we trick the browser and go back to copy our comment, then must change it a bit when we re-enter, or the blog says it's a duplicate.  This is a clue that the original comment actually exists although it did not show.

As you saw, re-entering the copied text and changing it a bit, followed by correctly typing the code, gets both old and new.

I guess it should work smoother ;) when we mis-type the code.  That's the thought.  Hope it helps you or your web-brother.

Anyway, nice wishes up there in the 'zone'...

Cheers,
Clive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, &#8216;code&#8217; is what we have to enter to make our comment succeed.  </p>
<p>The so-called CAPTCHA  thingie.</p>
<p>If you mis-enter then you are asked to try again - but your comment shows blank then. </p>
<p>Then we are confused.  Enter the new &#8216;code&#8217; now showing?  Will we lose our comment which has now gone blank?  Etc..</p>
<p>If we trick the browser and go back to copy our comment, then must change it a bit when we re-enter, or the blog says it&#8217;s a duplicate.  This is a clue that the original comment actually exists although it did not show.</p>
<p>As you saw, re-entering the copied text and changing it a bit, followed by correctly typing the code, gets both old and new.</p>
<p>I guess it should work smoother ;) when we mis-type the code.  That&#8217;s the thought.  Hope it helps you or your web-brother.</p>
<p>Anyway, nice wishes up there in the &#8216;zone&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Clive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Rytterfalk</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59359</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Rytterfalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59359</guid>
		<description>Hi Clive.. Code thing? Not sure where I wrote about code. :D Help me!

Thanks for comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clive.. Code thing? Not sure where I wrote about code. :D Help me!</p>
<p>Thanks for comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive</title>
		<link>http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59352</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rytterfalk.com/2007/06/17/pic-finally-sven-jeanettes-wedding-pictures/#comment-59352</guid>
		<description>Well, it was really a very family occasion, wasn't it.

Very nice pictures for them to remember by, Carl.

I must say they look a very friendly and happy couple.  Jeannette's laugh I have a feeling very good for Sven.

Hello to that lens-holding young woman also ;)

Best,
Clive


p.s. your code thing confusing, do we lose message if get it wrong??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was really a very family occasion, wasn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>Very nice pictures for them to remember by, Carl.</p>
<p>I must say they look a very friendly and happy couple.  Jeannette&#8217;s laugh I have a feeling very good for Sven.</p>
<p>Hello to that lens-holding young woman also ;)</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Clive</p>
<p>p.s. your code thing confusing, do we lose message if get it wrong??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
